↓ Skip to main content

Relato de Caso - Nefropatia de IgA associada ao ANCA com evolução favorável

Overview of attention for article published in Jornal Brasileiro de Nefrologia, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Relato de Caso - Nefropatia de IgA associada ao ANCA com evolução favorável
Published in
Jornal Brasileiro de Nefrologia, January 2015
DOI 10.5935/0101-2800.20150063
Pubmed ID
Authors

Flávia Lara Barcelos, Tânia Maria de Souza Fontes

Abstract

The antineutrophil cytoplasmatic antibody (ANCA) is usually associated with pauci-immune crescentic glomerulonephritis (CrGN). However, the literature show an incidence unexpected high of ANCA in immunocomplex CrNP. The crescent IgA nephropaty is one of CrGN that associated with ANCAObjective:To relate an IgA nephropaty ANCA positive and sign of worse prognosis that improved with immunossupression. 38-year-old pacient with arterial hypertension, renal impairment (CKD-EPI 37 ml/min/1,73 m2), non-nephrotic proteinuria and hematuria. He related occasionally epistaxis, rhnosinusitis and one arthritis episode that spontaneously resolved. During de investigation, the ANCA titles were 1/160 and anti-RP3 was positive, however renal biopsy showed IgA nephropaty with 38% of crescents. Regarding IgA nephropaty ANCA positive as the main diagnosis, immunossupression therapy with corticoids (1g IV methilprednisone for 3 days followed by 1 mg/kg/day prednisone) for 6 months and cyclophosphamide (500 mg initially then raise the dose until reach 750 m2. The patient improved renal function and reduced the proteinuria and ANCA titulation. The role of the association between IgA nephropathy and ANCA is it aggressive manifestation characterized by the presence of crescents, tubular atrophy and renal dysfunction, which may regress with early onset of immunosuppression treatment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 33%
Student > Master 2 22%
Researcher 1 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 11%
Unknown 2 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 56%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 11%
Arts and Humanities 1 11%
Unknown 2 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2015.
All research outputs
#23,154,082
of 25,806,080 outputs
Outputs from Jornal Brasileiro de Nefrologia
#325
of 383 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#309,121
of 361,893 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Jornal Brasileiro de Nefrologia
#18
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,080 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 383 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,893 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.