↓ Skip to main content

Diretrizes Brasileiras de Mobilização Precoce em Unidade de Terapia Intensiva

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#47 of 376)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
305 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Diretrizes Brasileiras de Mobilização Precoce em Unidade de Terapia Intensiva
Published in
Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva, January 2019
DOI 10.5935/0103-507x.20190084
Pubmed ID
Authors

Esperidião Elias Aquim, Wanderley Marques Bernardo, Renata Ferreira Buzzini, Nara Selaimen Gaertner de Azeredo, Laura Severo da Cunha, Marta Cristina Pauleti Damasceno, Rafael Alexandre de Oliveira Deucher, Antonio Carlos Magalhães Duarte, Juliana Thiemy Librelato, Cesar Augusto Melo-Silva, Sergio Nogueira Nemer, Sabrina Donatti Ferreira da Silva, Cleber Verona

Abstract

Immobility can cause several complications, including skeletal muscle atrophy and weakness, that influence the recovery of critically ill patients. This effect can be mitigated by early mobilization. Six key questions guided this research: Is early mobilization safe? Which patients are candidates for early mobilization? What are the contraindications? What is the appropriate dose, and how should it be defined? What results are obtained? What are the prognostic indicators for the use of early mobilization? The objective of this guideline was to produce a document that would provide evidence-based recommendations and suggestions regarding the early mobilization of critically ill adult patients, with the aim of improving understanding of the topic and making a positive impact on patient care. This guideline was based on a systematic review of articles conducted using the PICO search strategy, as recommended by the Guidelines Project of the Associação Médica Brasileira. Randomized clinical trials, prognostic cohort studies, and systematic reviews with or without meta-analysis were selected, and the evidence was classified according to the Oxford Center for Evidence-based Medicine Levels of Evidence. For all the questions addressed, enough evidence was found to support safe and well-defined early mobilization, with prognostic indicators that support and recommend the technique. Early mobilization is associated with better functional outcomes and should be performed whenever indicated. Early mobilization is safe and should be the goal of the entire multidisciplinary team.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 305 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 305 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 40 13%
Student > Master 17 6%
Student > Postgraduate 12 4%
Researcher 10 3%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 3%
Other 30 10%
Unknown 187 61%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 62 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 25 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 2%
Unspecified 4 1%
Neuroscience 3 <1%
Other 15 5%
Unknown 191 63%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2025.
All research outputs
#4,958,358
of 29,400,575 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva
#47
of 376 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,472
of 458,609 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva
#2
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,400,575 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 376 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 458,609 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.