↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Forestier’s disease and its implications in otolaryngology: literature review ✩ ✩ Please cite this article as: Pulcherio JOB, Velasco CMMO, Machado RS, Souza WN, Menezes DR. Forestier’s disease and its implications in otolaryngology: literature review. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2014;80:161-6. , ✩✩ ✩✩ Study conducted at Hospital Central da Polícia Militar do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Published in
Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology, July 2014
DOI 10.5935/1808-8694.20140033
Pubmed ID
Authors

Janaina Oliveira Bentivi Pulcherio, Cláudia Márcia Malafaia de Oliveira Velasco, Rosane Siciliano Machado, Wallace Nascimento de Souza, Daniella Rossi de Menezes

Abstract

Forestier's disease affects the spinal column of primarily elderly men. It is not rare, but it is often undiagnosed and can lead to significant morbidity and mortality. When it affects the cervical spine, it can result in important otorhinolaryngological manifestations.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 48 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 10 21%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 10%
Researcher 5 10%
Student > Master 4 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 6%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 16 33%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 19 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2014.
All research outputs
#19,918,349
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology
#482
of 726 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#166,194
of 240,568 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology
#13
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 726 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,568 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.