↓ Skip to main content

Malaria and Vascular Endothelium

Overview of attention for article published in Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Malaria and Vascular Endothelium
Published in
Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia, July 2014
DOI 10.5935/abc.20140088
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Involvement of the cardiovascular system in patients with infectious and parasitic diseases can result from both intrinsic mechanisms of the disease and drug intervention. Malaria is an example, considering that the endothelial injury by Plasmodium-infected erythrocytes can cause circulatory disorders. This is a literature review aimed at discussing the relationship between malaria and endothelial impairment, especially its effects on the cardiovascular system. We discuss the implications of endothelial aggression and the interdisciplinarity that should guide the malaria patient care, whose acute infection can contribute to precipitate or aggravate a preexisting heart disease.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Colombia 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Belgium 1 1%
Unknown 79 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 21%
Student > Bachelor 14 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 12%
Researcher 4 5%
Student > Postgraduate 4 5%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 22 27%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 5%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 22 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 December 2021.
All research outputs
#15,738,224
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia
#385
of 1,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,711
of 240,600 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia
#4
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,210 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,600 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.