You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Network Meta-analysis to Synthesize Evidence for Decision Making in Cardiovascular Research
|
---|---|
Published in |
Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia, April 2016
|
DOI | 10.5935/abc.20160052 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Leonardo Roever, Giuseppe Biondi-Zoccai |
Abstract |
Clinical decision-making requires synthesis of evidence from literature reviews focused on a specific theme. Evidence synthesis is performed with qualitative assessments and systematic reviews of randomized clinical trials, typically covering statistical pooling with pairwise meta-analyses. These methods include adjusted indirect comparison meta-analysis, network meta-analysis, and mixed-treatment comparison. These tools allow synthesis of evidence and comparison of effectiveness in cardiovascular research. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 50% |
Italy | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 34 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 5 | 14% |
Researcher | 5 | 14% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 9% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 9% |
Student > Master | 3 | 9% |
Other | 6 | 17% |
Unknown | 10 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 37% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 14% |
Engineering | 2 | 6% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 3% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 12 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2016.
All research outputs
#19,944,091
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia
#733
of 1,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#219,500
of 314,719 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia
#12
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,210 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,719 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.