↓ Skip to main content

7th Brazilian Guideline of Arterial Hypertension: Chapter 2 - Diagnosis and Classification

Overview of attention for article published in Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
7th Brazilian Guideline of Arterial Hypertension: Chapter 2 - Diagnosis and Classification
Published in
Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia, September 2016
DOI 10.5935/abc.20160152
Pubmed ID
Authors

MVB Malachias, WKSB Souza, FL Plavnik, CIS Rodrigues, AA Brandão, MFT Neves, LA Bortolotto, RJS Franco, CEP Figueiredo, PCBV Jardim, C Amodeo, ECD Barbosa, V Koch, MAM Gomes, RB Paula, RMS Póvoa, FC Colombo, S Ferreira Filho, RD Miranda, CA Machado, F Nobre, AR Nogueira, D Mion Júnior, S Kaiser, CLM Forjaz, FA Almeida, JFV Martim, N Sass, LF Drager, E Muxfeldt, LC Bodanese, AD Feitosa, D Malta, S Fuchs, ME Magalhães, W Oigman, OM Gomes, AMG Pierin, GS Feitosa, MRFL Bortolotto, LBNC Magalhães, ACS Silva, JM Ribeiro, FAO Borelli, M Gus, O Passarelli Júnior, JY Toledo, GF Salles, LC Martins, TSV Jardim, ICB Guimarães, IC Antonello, E Lima Júnior, V Matsudo, GV Silva, LS Costa, A Alessi, LCN Scala, EB Coelho, D Souza, HF Lopes, MMG Gowdak, AC Cordeiro Júnior, MR Torloni, MRST Klein, PK Nogueira, LAD Lotaif, GBA Rosito, H Moreno Júnior

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 11%
Student > Master 2 11%
Researcher 2 11%
Librarian 1 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 9 50%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Computer Science 1 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 6%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 11 61%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2025.
All research outputs
#5,576,247
of 29,043,514 outputs
Outputs from Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia
#168
of 1,685 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,488
of 317,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia
#3
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,043,514 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,685 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,314 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.