You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
High-Intensity Interval Training in Heart Transplant Recipients: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia, February 2018
|
| DOI | 10.5935/abc.20180017 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Raphael José Perrier-Melo, Fernando Augusto Marinho dos Santos Figueira, Guilherme Veiga Guimarães, Manoel da Cunha Costa |
| Abstract |
Heart transplantation (HTx) is considered an efficient and gold-standard procedure for patients with end-stage heart failure. After surgery, patients have lower aerobic power (VO2max) and compensatory hemodynamic responses. The aim of the present study was to assess through a systematic review with meta-analysis whether high-intensity interval training (HIIT) can provide benefits for those parameters. This is a systematic review with meta-analysis, which searched the databases and data portals PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Science Direct and Wiley until December 2016 (pairs). The following terms and descriptors were used: "heart recipient" OR "heart transplant recipient" OR "heart transplant" OR "cardiac transplant" OR "heart graft". Descriptors via DeCS and Mesh were: "heart transplantation'' OR "cardiac transplantation". The words used in combination (AND) were: "exercise training" OR "interval training" OR "high intensity interval training" OR "high intensity training" OR "anaerobic training" OR "intermittent training" OR "sprint training". The initial search identified 1064 studies. Then, only those studies assessing the influence of HIIT on the post-HTx period were added, resulting in three studies analyzed. The significance level adopted was 0.05. Heart transplant recipients showed significant improvement in VO2peak, heart rate and peak blood pressure in 8 to 12 weeks of intervention. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 162 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 162 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 38 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 11% |
| Researcher | 10 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 18 | 11% |
| Unknown | 54 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 21% |
| Sports and Recreations | 30 | 19% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 23 | 14% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 14 | 9% |
| Unknown | 56 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2021.
All research outputs
#4,762,265
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia
#114
of 1,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,159
of 344,213 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia
#1
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,210 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,213 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.