↓ Skip to main content

Erratum

Overview of attention for article published in Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

podcasts
1 podcast
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Erratum
Published in
Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia, January 2019
DOI 10.5935/abc.20190004
Pubmed ID

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2025.
All research outputs
#7,800,741
of 29,485,101 outputs
Outputs from Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia
#255
of 1,700 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,471
of 459,383 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia
#4
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,485,101 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,700 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 459,383 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.