You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Articles with short titles describing the results are cited more often
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinics, May 2012
|
| DOI | 10.6061/clinics/2012(05)17 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Carlos Eduardo Paiva, João Paulo da Silveira Nogueira Lima, Bianca Sakamoto Ribeiro Paiva |
| Abstract |
The aim of this study was to evaluate some features of article titles from open access journals and to assess the possible impact of these titles on predicting the number of article views and citations. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 94 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 17 | 18% |
| United States | 15 | 16% |
| Australia | 10 | 11% |
| Canada | 5 | 5% |
| Ireland | 3 | 3% |
| Belgium | 2 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 2% |
| Sweden | 2 | 2% |
| Norway | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 11 | 12% |
| Unknown | 26 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 42 | 45% |
| Scientists | 34 | 36% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 12 | 13% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 268 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Serbia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 255 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 40 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 24 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 16 | 6% |
| Other | 69 | 26% |
| Unknown | 60 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 44 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 18 | 7% |
| Linguistics | 16 | 6% |
| Engineering | 15 | 6% |
| Other | 82 | 31% |
| Unknown | 74 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 82. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 December 2022.
All research outputs
#540,982
of 26,012,510 outputs
Outputs from Clinics
#19
of 1,235 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,455
of 176,535 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinics
#3
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,012,510 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,235 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,535 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.