You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluation of the correlation between dental occlusion and posture using a force platform
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinics, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.6061/clinics/2013(01)oa07 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alberto Baldini, Alessandro Nota, Domenico Tripodi, Salvatore Longoni, Paola Cozza |
| Abstract |
Force platforms are widely used to evaluate the relationship between posture and dental occlusion. This study evaluated whether force platforms are able to detect eventual postural modifications resulting from dental occlusion. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | 33% |
| Canada | 1 | 11% |
| Brazil | 1 | 11% |
| United States | 1 | 11% |
| France | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 2 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 22% |
| Scientists | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 161 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 157 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 34 | 21% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 33 | 20% |
| Unknown | 41 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 81 | 50% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 9 | 6% |
| Unknown | 44 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2015.
All research outputs
#5,404,723
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Clinics
#209
of 1,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,309
of 288,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinics
#7
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,215 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,986 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.