You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluation of sensitivity, motor and pain thresholds across the menstrual cycle through medium-frequency transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinics, July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.6061/clinics/2013(07)03 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mariana de Brito Barbosa, Elaine Caldeira de Oliveira Guirro, Fabiana Roberta Nunes |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 59 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Thailand | 5 | 8% |
| United States | 2 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 2% |
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 49 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 57 | 97% |
| Scientists | 1 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 59 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 12 | 20% |
| Researcher | 9 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 16 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 27% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 18% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 20 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 88. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2022.
All research outputs
#496,175
of 25,937,538 outputs
Outputs from Clinics
#16
of 1,232 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,478
of 207,795 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinics
#1
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,937,538 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,232 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,795 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.