You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
New mindset in scientific method in the health field: Design Thinking
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinics, December 2015
|
| DOI | 10.6061/clinics/2015(12)01 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Fernando Kobuti Ferreira, Elaine Horibe Song, Heitor Gomes, Elvio Bueno Garcia, Lydia Masako Ferreira |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 30% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 20% |
| South Africa | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 4 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 80% |
| Scientists | 2 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 165 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 165 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 34 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 11% |
| Researcher | 13 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 7% |
| Professor | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 34 | 21% |
| Unknown | 47 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 12% |
| Design | 12 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 29 | 18% |
| Unknown | 54 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2018.
All research outputs
#4,788,399
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Clinics
#171
of 1,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,523
of 395,408 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinics
#5
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,215 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,408 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.