Title |
Use of direct oral anticoagulants for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension
|
---|---|
Published in |
Clinics, May 2018
|
DOI | 10.6061/clinics/2018/e216 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Francisca Alexandra Gavilanes-Oleas, Jose Leonidas Alves, Caio Julio Cesar Fernandes, Luis Felipe Lopes Prada, William Salibe, Mario Terra, Luciana Morinaga, Susana Hoette, Carlos Jardim, Rogerio Souza |
Abstract |
Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension is one of the most prevalent forms of pulmonary hypertension and is a major complication of acute pulmonary embolism. One mainstay of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension treatment is lifelong anticoagulation. The recent advent of direct oral anticoagulants for acute pulmonary embolism treatment has provided a viable and effective alternative for treating this condition. However, little is known about the efficacy of this new class of drugs for treating chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants in the treatment of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. A cohort of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension patients who initiated treatment with direct oral anticoagulants between June 2015 and November 2016 were enrolled in this study. Sixteen patients used rivaroxaban, three used dabigatran and one used apixaban for a mean follow-up of 20.9 months. The mean age was 51 years, and eighteen patients were classified as functional class II/III. Eight patients underwent a pulmonary endarterectomy and exhibited clinical, hemodynamic and functional improvement and currently continue to use direct oral anticoagulants. No episode of venous thromboembolism recurrence was identified during the follow-up period, but there was one episode of major bleeding after a traumatic fall. Although direct oral anticoagulants appear to be a safe and effective alternative for treating chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension, larger studies are needed to support their routine use. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | 13% |
France | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 6 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 88% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 34 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 6 | 18% |
Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 12% |
Researcher | 3 | 9% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 9% |
Other | 5 | 15% |
Unknown | 10 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 35% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 9% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 6% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 14 | 41% |