↓ Skip to main content

Trained innate immunity, COVID-19 therapeutic dilemma, and fake science

Overview of attention for article published in Clinics, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
Title
Trained innate immunity, COVID-19 therapeutic dilemma, and fake science
Published in
Clinics, July 2020
DOI 10.6061/clinics/2020/e2124
Pubmed ID
Authors

José Ernesto Belizário

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 70 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 14%
Student > Bachelor 8 11%
Other 5 7%
Researcher 5 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 7%
Other 15 21%
Unknown 22 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 26 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2020.
All research outputs
#20,669,432
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Clinics
#860
of 1,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#330,175
of 430,444 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinics
#18
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,215 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,444 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.