↓ Skip to main content

Updated recommendations for the management of upper respiratory tract infections in South Africa

Overview of attention for article published in South African Medical Journal, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
99 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Updated recommendations for the management of upper respiratory tract infections in South Africa
Published in
South African Medical Journal, September 2015
DOI 10.7196/samj.8716
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adrian J Brink, Mark F Cotton, Charles Feldman, Heather Finlayson, Ray L Friedman, Robin Green, Willy Hendson, Maurice H Hockman, Gary Maartens, Shabir A Madhi, Gary Reubenson, Eddie J Silverbauer, Inge L Zietsman

Abstract

BackgroundInappropriate use of antibiotics for non-severe upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs), most of which are viral, significantly adds to the burden of antibiotic resistance. Since the introduction of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines in 2009 in South Africa, the relative frequency of the major bacterial pathogens causing acute otitis media (AOM) and acute bacterial rhinosinusitis (ABRS) has changed.RecommendationsSince URTIs are mostly viral in aetiology and bacterial AOM and ABRS frequently resolve spontaneously, the guideline includes diagnostic criteria to separate viral from bacterial causes and hence, those patients not requiring antibiotics. Penicillin remains the drug of choice for tonsillopharyngitis. Amoxicillin remains the drug of choice for both AOM and ABRS. A dose of 90 mg/kg/day is recommended for children, which should be effective for pneumococci with high-level penicillin resistance and will also cover most infections with H. influenzae. Amoxicillin-clavulanate (in high-dose amoxicillin formulations available for both children and adults) should be considered initial treatment of choice in patients with recent antibiotic therapy with amoxicillin (previous 30 days) and with resistant H.influenzae infections pending the results of studies of local epidemiology (β-lactamase production ≥15%). The macrolide/azalide class of antibiotics are not recommended routinely for URTIs and are reserved for β-lactam allergic patients. ConclusionThe guideline should facilitate rational antibiotic precribing for URTIs as a component of antibiotic stewardship. However, it requires updating when new information becomes available particularly from randomised controlled trials and surveillance studies of local etiology and antibiotic susceptibility patterns.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 1 1%
Unknown 98 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 12%
Student > Postgraduate 12 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 11%
Student > Master 11 11%
Student > Bachelor 10 10%
Other 20 20%
Unknown 23 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 38%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 5%
Environmental Science 5 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 4%
Other 14 14%
Unknown 25 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2015.
All research outputs
#23,320,957
of 25,988,468 outputs
Outputs from South African Medical Journal
#19
of 20 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#244,479
of 284,965 outputs
Outputs of similar age from South African Medical Journal
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,988,468 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one scored the same or higher as 1 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,965 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them