↓ Skip to main content

Failure mode and effects analysis applied to the administration of liquid medication by oral syringes

Overview of attention for article published in Farmacia Hospitalaria, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#42 of 375)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Failure mode and effects analysis applied to the administration of liquid medication by oral syringes
Published in
Farmacia Hospitalaria, November 2017
DOI 10.7399/fh.10792
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jesús María Aranaz-Andrés, Teresa Bermejo-Vicedo, Isabel Muñoz-Ojeda, Eva Delgado-Silveira, Sonia Chamorro-Rubio, Ángeles Fernández-Puentes, Marta García-Collía, Eva María Guerra-Alia

Abstract

To carry out a Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) to the use of oral syringes. A multidisciplinary team was assembled within the Safety Committee.  The stages of oral administration process of liquid  medication were analysed, identifying the most critical and establishing the  potential modes of failure that can cause errors. The impact associated with  each mode of failure was calculated using the Risk Priority Number (RPN).  Preventive actions were proposed. Five failure modes were identified, all classified as high risk (RPN>  100). Seven of the eight preventive actions were implemented. The FMEA methodology was a useful tool. It has allowed to know  the risks, analyse the causes that cause them, their effects on patient safety and  the measures to reduce them.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 24%
Student > Master 3 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 10%
Other 1 5%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 3 14%
Engineering 2 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 5%
Arts and Humanities 1 5%
Other 4 19%
Unknown 9 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2017.
All research outputs
#5,363,212
of 25,610,986 outputs
Outputs from Farmacia Hospitalaria
#42
of 375 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,255
of 341,482 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Farmacia Hospitalaria
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,610,986 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 375 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,482 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them