↓ Skip to main content

Monitoring the quality of the hospital pharmacoterapeutic process by sentinel patient program

Overview of attention for article published in Farmacia Hospitalaria, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Monitoring the quality of the hospital pharmacoterapeutic process by sentinel patient program
Published in
Farmacia Hospitalaria, March 2018
DOI 10.7399/fh.10793
Pubmed ID
Authors

María José Fernández-Megía, Isabel Font Noguera, Matilde Merino Sanjuán, José Luis Poveda Andrés

Abstract

To analyze the results of sentinel patient program to monitoring the  quality pharmacoterapeutic process in the hospitalized patient through  medication errors. Design: Observational, prospective and transversal study. Ambit: General hospital of 1,000 beds. From May 2011 to June 2016.  Sample: Patients with treatment prescribe within 24 hours of being admitted  with 4 or more medications. Medication error, drugs prescribed,  medications and doses dispensing, drugs administered. Safety indicators were  defined based on medication errors at each stage of the pharmacotherapeutic  process. Of the 746 patients studied, 334 had at least 1 medication error  (44.8%; IC95%: 41.7-47.8). In the 746 treatments, 564 medication errors were  detected (0.75 errors by patient; IC95%: 0.7-0.8). The safety indicators  (medication error by stage) were: 5.1% (38/746 patients) for omission of  allergy record; 2.3% (156/6 724 drugs) for prescription; 0.6% (38/6 724 drugs)  for validation, 2.6% for dispensing (142/5 465 drugs) y 3.7% (190/5  111 administered drugs observed) for administration. The temporal evolution of  the indicators, with graphs of statistical control showed stable processes, except  for the administration. The proposed improvement actions were of a training,  standardization and organizational type. The sentinel patient program provides an overview of the quality  of the pharmacotherapeutic process and promotes the safety culture at the  center. Statistical control charts have been a useful tool for monitoring  medication errors. The analysis of medication errors has served to propose  improvement actions in each stage of the pharmacotherapeutic process.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 28%
Other 3 10%
Student > Postgraduate 3 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 3%
Student > Bachelor 1 3%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 11 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 10%
Engineering 2 7%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 12 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2018.
All research outputs
#8,430,732
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Farmacia Hospitalaria
#84
of 368 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#137,482
of 344,853 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Farmacia Hospitalaria
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 368 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,853 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.