↓ Skip to main content

Observational study of drug-drug interactions in oncological inpatients

Overview of attention for article published in Farmacia Hospitalaria, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Observational study of drug-drug interactions in oncological inpatients
Published in
Farmacia Hospitalaria, January 2018
DOI 10.7399/fh.10857
Pubmed ID
Authors

María Sacramento Díaz-Carrasco, Miguel Almanchel-Rivadeneyra, Aina Tomás-Luiz, Sandra Pelegrín-Montesinos, Cristina Ramírez-Roig, Juan José Fernández-Ávila

Abstract

To determine the prevalence of potential clinically relevant drug- drug interactions in adult oncological inpatients, as well as to describe the most  frequent interactions. A standard database was used. An observational, transversal, and descriptive study including patients  admitted to the Oncology Service of a reference hospital. All prescriptions were  collected twice a week during a month. They were analysed using Lexicomp®  database, recording all interactions classified with a level of risk: C, D or X. A total of 1 850 drug-drug interactions were detected in 218  treatments. The prevalence of treatments with at least one clinically relevant  interaction was 95%, being 94.5% for those at level C and 26.1% for levels D  and X. The drugs most commonly involved in the interactions detected were  opioid analgesics, antipsychotics (butyrophenones), benzodiazepines,  pyrazolones, glucocorticoids and heparins, whereas interactions with  antineoplastics were minimal, highlighting those related to paclitaxel and  between metamizole and various antineoplastics. The prevalence of clinically relevant drug-drug interactions rate  was very high, highlighting the high risk percentage of them related to level of  risk X. Due to the frequency of onset and potential severity, highlighted the  concomitant use of central nervous system depressants drugs with risk of  respiratory depression, the risk of onset of anticholinergic symptoms when  combining morphine or haloperidol with butylscopolamine, ipratropium bromide  or dexchlorpheniramine and the multiple interactions involving metamizole.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 46 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 6 13%
Student > Master 5 11%
Other 4 9%
Researcher 3 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 4%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 20 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 7%
Psychology 2 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 22 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2018.
All research outputs
#15,523,434
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Farmacia Hospitalaria
#139
of 368 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#242,876
of 449,550 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Farmacia Hospitalaria
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 368 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,550 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them