↓ Skip to main content

Pharmacist-led intervention on potentially inappropriate prescription in patients with polypharmacy: PHARM-PC clinical trial protocol.

Overview of attention for article published in Farmacia Hospitalaria, June 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#12 of 368)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
9 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pharmacist-led intervention on potentially inappropriate prescription in patients with polypharmacy: PHARM-PC clinical trial protocol.
Published in
Farmacia Hospitalaria, June 2021
DOI 10.7399/fh.11575
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jesús Martínez-Sotelo, Manel Pinteño-Blanco, Rosario García-Ramos, Joan Llobera-Cànaves, María Isabel Cadavid-Torres

Abstract

Polypharmacy and potentially inappropriate medications (that  is, those associated with an unfavorable risk-benefit ratio) are common concerns in the context of elderly patients treated in primary care as they may increase the risk of morbidity and mortality, as well as  healthcare costs. Several studies have assessed the impact of pharmacist- led systematic reviews with respect to prescription appropriateness, health outcomes and/or costs. However, no cluster-randomized controlled  trial has been identified that provides an overall assessment of these  variables. The objective is to determine the effectiveness of a pharmacist- led systematic medication review in reducing the mean number and proportion of patients on potentially inappropriate medications (primary  goal); as well as in decreasing morbidity and mortality and the cost of  medications and the use of healthcare resources (secondary goals). An open-label, cluster-randomized controlled trial will be conducted; where primary care physicians will be randomized either to receive (intervention group) or not to receive pharmacist  recommendations to withdraw potentially inappropriate medications  detected through the combined use of explicit and implicit criteria (control  group). Primary end-points will be the proportion of patients on potentially inappropriate medications and the mean number of such medications per  patient. Secondary endpoints will be healthcare resources used, the  proportion of patients who die and the mean number of days survived, as  well as the cost of medications and cost of healthcare resources used. In line with similar reports and based on our study´s design, we hope to obtain statistically significant reductions in the use  of potentially inappropriate medications and in medication costs overall.  We do not however expect to obtain significant reductions in  morbimortality or the cost of health resources employed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 18%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 5%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 14 64%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 27%
Chemistry 2 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Unknown 13 59%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2022.
All research outputs
#2,746,468
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Farmacia Hospitalaria
#12
of 368 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,806
of 445,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Farmacia Hospitalaria
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 368 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,312 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them