↓ Skip to main content

Specialized training in hospital pharmacy: an overview of the concerns, needs and current situation of resident tutors

Overview of attention for article published in Farmacia Hospitalaria, October 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Specialized training in hospital pharmacy: an overview of the concerns, needs and current situation of resident tutors
Published in
Farmacia Hospitalaria, October 2021
DOI 10.7399/fh.11616
Pubmed ID
Authors

Patricia Sanmartín-Fenollera, María Dolores Zamora-Barrios, Teresa Giménez-Poderós, María Amparo Talens-Bolos, Eva Negro-Vega, on behalf of the Tutors’ Group of the Spanish Society of Hospital Pharmacists.

Abstract

To provide new insight into the training needs and resources required by hospital pharmacy resident tutors in Spain, as well as  into their level of motivation and satisfaction with their teaching. Method: Google Forms® was used to design a survey addressed to hospital pharmacy resident tutors between January and March 2019. They survey consisted of generic (tutor, hospital, service) and specific  questions (available resources, teaching activities, teaching satisfaction,  training needs). A univariate exploratory analysis was conducted to study  possible factors related to teaching satisfaction and motivation. Results: Replies were received from 83 tutors (rate of response: 52.8%), from  15/17 Spanish regions. The annual resident/tutor ratio was 4 (IQR = 2- 4). A total of 96.4% of tutors conducted interviews, of whom 65.1% did so  quarterly. Other activities included the management of external training  rotations (97.6%), planning of rotations (97.6%) and annual  appraisals  (96.4%). Only 17.1% of respondents were given time off their regular duties  for their tutorship work, with 71.4% stating that the time they were allowed  was insufficient. A total of 70.7% of tutors from eight Spanish regions where  the granting of protected time was regulated said were not given any time off  for their teaching endeavors. Most tutors declared to be satisfied (66.7%) and  motivated (63%) with their teaching work. Motivation appeared to fall with  age, and both motivation and satisfaction decreased as a function of the tutors'  years of professional experience and when they were given no time off  for their tutorship work or when the remuneration was low, without any  relationship being identified between these factors. Tutors pointed out that work should be done to increase the number of hours assigned to tutorships  (78%), preparing SEFH-validated training plans (76.8%), improving teaching  techniques (65.9%), and decreasing the clinical workload (62.2%). Over the  past 3 years, 69.1% of tutors had received training. This training was arranged  by educational committees (63.3%), the Spanish regional authorities  (42.4%) and SEFH (13.6%). All the training in clinical, teaching, and communicative competencies enjoyed wide acceptance (> 90%). The  preferred delivery method was hybrid (partly on-line and partly onsite)  (64.6%). SEFH's tutors' group conducted its first national survey  addressed to hospital pharmacy resident tutors. The survey showed that, although tutors are highly satisfied with their teaching activities, they  ould like more training and to be able to devote more time to their tutorship work. It was also shown that a regulatory framework needs to be  implemented in various Spanish regions and that compliance with existing  regional regulations must be improved.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 15%
Lecturer 1 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 8%
Student > Master 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 6 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 2 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 8%
Arts and Humanities 1 8%
Psychology 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 5 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2021.
All research outputs
#14,795,067
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Farmacia Hospitalaria
#128
of 368 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#194,969
of 439,349 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Farmacia Hospitalaria
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 368 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,349 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.