↓ Skip to main content

Interdisciplinary recommendations document to improve adherence in patients with chronic inflammatory diseases: Adhing recommendations

Overview of attention for article published in Farmacia Hospitalaria, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interdisciplinary recommendations document to improve adherence in patients with chronic inflammatory diseases: Adhing recommendations
Published in
Farmacia Hospitalaria, September 2016
DOI 10.7399/fh.2016.40.5.10180
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fernando Bermejo San José, Mireia Barceló Barceló-Bru, Miquel Ribera-Pibernat, José Luís Poveda-Andrés, Luciano Sanromán-Álvarez

Abstract

Patient compliance in chronic inflammatory diseases is essential to achieve treatment effectiveness. The study objective is to develop a recommendations document for healthcare professionals to encourage treatment compliance. A sequential methodology was followed: 1. Systematic review of EBM Reviews, Embase and MedLine without time restriction of interventions on compliance in chronic inflammatory diseases. Studies were selected according to previously defined criteria (confirmed diagnosis of chronic inflammatory disease of patients included, assessment of adherence interventions and experimental study design). 2. Three expert workshops (hospital pharmacy, nursing and medical specialties) to elaborate recommendations. 3. Expert online voting about the degree of agreement with recommendations. 4. Final face to face consensus workshop. A total of 1 115 papers were identified, 84 were fully reviewed and 30 were selected according to criteria. A preli minary list of 8 recommendations based on evidence was developed and discussed in the expert workshops. As a result, a new version of 14 recommendations was created. Later, online voting showed a high degree of agreement among experts: 7 out of 14 recommendations obtained unanimous approval; in the other 7, 1 to 3 experts were partially in disagreement. Recommendations without unanimous agreement were further reviewed and modified in the face to face meeting and final recommendations were approved unanimously. This consensus statement gathers all relevant aspects to be interdisciplinary considered to detect, monitor and assess medication adherence, involving the patient in the process. Further studies are needed to assess the impact of interventions to improve compliance in patients with chronic inflammatory diseases both in terms of adherence and in health outcomes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 23%
Student > Postgraduate 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Librarian 3 9%
Other 2 6%
Other 6 17%
Unknown 9 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 11%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 9%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 8 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2016.
All research outputs
#16,584,977
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Farmacia Hospitalaria
#166
of 368 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#216,409
of 348,375 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Farmacia Hospitalaria
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 368 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,375 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them