↓ Skip to main content

Knowledge, attitudes and practices regarding malaria in the indigenous Guna population of the Madungandí region, Panamá, 2012

Overview of attention for article published in Biomédica, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Knowledge, attitudes and practices regarding malaria in the indigenous Guna population of the Madungandí region, Panamá, 2012
Published in
Biomédica, May 2015
DOI 10.7705/biomedica.v35i4.2386
Pubmed ID
Authors

Margarita Griffith, José Rovira, Rolando Torres, José Calzada, Carlos Victoria, Lorenzo Cáceres

Abstract

Knowledge, attitudes and practices surveys allow to determine the degree of knowledge on the management of malaria in a given population, as well as the attitudes and practices that contribute or not to its transmission. To identify the knowledge, attitudes and practices that favor or not the transmission of malaria in the indigenous Guna population of Madungandí. A cross-sectional study was conducted by applying a survey to the heads of the families in a sample of 40% of households in three communities with high malaria incidence. Local Guna residents and translators were part of the research team that applied the questionnaires. The statistical analysis was performed in Epi-Info 6.04. The age range of those surveyed was between 20 and 70 years. All responders indicated that they belonged to and spoke the language of the Guna ethnic group, 64% were male and 30% were illiterate. Half (51%) of the responders declared they had suffered malaria at least once in the last eight years, and 89% accepted that malaria was a health problem. Sixty-three per cent responded that their traditional doctors, “inadule”, cured malaria and 7.0 % practiced the “pipe smoking” and “cocoa burn” rituals to prevent the disease. Considering the limited knowledge about malaria and its vector, as well as the willingness to collaborate shown by the Guna population, it is essential to initiate educational and participative programs to improve control and prevention activities in the communities aimed at achieving a reduction in malaria incidence in the Madungandí indigenous region.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Peru 1 4%
Panama 1 4%
Unknown 26 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 32%
Other 3 11%
Student > Bachelor 3 11%
Lecturer 1 4%
Professor 1 4%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 8 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 3 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 11%
Engineering 2 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 7%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 11 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2016.
All research outputs
#20,660,571
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Biomédica
#674
of 848 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#206,183
of 280,402 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biomédica
#9
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 848 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,402 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.