You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Neuroimaging evidence for a network sampling theory of individual differences in human intelligence test performance
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Communications, April 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41467-021-22199-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Eyal Soreq, Ines R. Violante, Richard E. Daws, Adam Hampshire |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 82 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 21 | 26% |
| United States | 9 | 11% |
| Germany | 4 | 5% |
| Australia | 3 | 4% |
| India | 2 | 2% |
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| Côte d'Ivoire | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Portugal | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 8 | 10% |
| Unknown | 30 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 52 | 63% |
| Scientists | 23 | 28% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 5% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 68 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 19% |
| Researcher | 8 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 10% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 12% |
| Unknown | 24 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 12 | 18% |
| Psychology | 11 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 6% |
| Engineering | 3 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 13% |
| Unknown | 26 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 59. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2023.
All research outputs
#732,030
of 25,761,363 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#12,519
of 58,355 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,757
of 458,647 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#498
of 1,760 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,761,363 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 58,355 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 458,647 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,760 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.