You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Invasion and proliferation kinetics in enhancing gliomas predict IDH1 mutation status
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Neuro-Oncology, June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1093/neuonc/nou027 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anne L Baldock, Kevin Yagle, Donald E Born, Sunyoung Ahn, Andrew D Trister, Maxwell Neal, Sandra K Johnston, Carly A Bridge, David Basanta, Jacob Scott, Hani Malone, Adam M Sonabend, Peter Canoll, Maciej M Mrugala, Jason K Rockhill, Russell C Rockne, Kristin R Swanson |
| Abstract |
Glioblastomas with a specific mutation in the isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) gene have a better prognosis than gliomas with wild-type IDH1. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 58% |
| Unknown | 5 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 50% |
| Scientists | 3 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 64 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 22% |
| Researcher | 13 | 19% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 9% |
| Other | 12 | 18% |
| Unknown | 8 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 33% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 12% |
| Engineering | 4 | 6% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 18% |
| Unknown | 10 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2024.
All research outputs
#3,415,386
of 25,416,581 outputs
Outputs from Neuro-Oncology
#498
of 3,546 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,618
of 240,928 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuro-Oncology
#7
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,416,581 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,546 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,928 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.