↓ Skip to main content

Modelling biological invasions: Individual to population scales at interfaces

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Theoretical Biology, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Modelling biological invasions: Individual to population scales at interfaces
Published in
Journal of Theoretical Biology, June 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.jtbi.2013.05.033
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. Belmonte-Beitia, T.E. Woolley, J.G. Scott, P.K. Maini, E.A. Gaffney

Abstract

Extracting the population level behaviour of biological systems from that of the individual is critical in understanding dynamics across multiple scales and thus has been the subject of numerous investigations. Here, the influence of spatial heterogeneity in such contexts is explored for interfaces with a separation of the length scales characterising the individual and the interface, a situation that can arise in applications involving cellular modelling. As an illustrative example, we consider cell movement between white and grey matter in the brain which may be relevant in considering the invasive dynamics of glioma. We show that while one can safely neglect intrinsic noise, at least when considering glioma cell invasion, profound differences in population behaviours emerge in the presence of interfaces with only subtle alterations in the dynamics at the individual level. Transport driven by local cell sensing generates predictions of cell accumulations along interfaces where cell motility changes. This behaviour is not predicted with the commonly used Fickian diffusion transport model, but can be extracted from preliminary observations of specific cell lines in recent, novel, cryo-imaging. Consequently, these findings suggest a need to consider the impact of individual behaviour, spatial heterogeneity and especially interfaces in experimental and modelling frameworks of cellular dynamics, for instance in the characterisation of glioma cell motility.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 3%
Australia 1 3%
United Kingdom 1 3%
Canada 1 3%
New Zealand 1 3%
Mexico 1 3%
United States 1 3%
Unknown 32 82%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 23%
Researcher 7 18%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 8%
Student > Master 3 8%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 7 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 28%
Mathematics 9 23%
Engineering 2 5%
Physics and Astronomy 2 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 8 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2016.
All research outputs
#8,261,140
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Theoretical Biology
#1,207
of 4,010 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,767
of 209,493 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Theoretical Biology
#9
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,010 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,493 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.