You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Antibiotic collateral sensitivity is contingent on the repeatability of evolution
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Communications, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41467-018-08098-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daniel Nichol, Joseph Rutter, Christopher Bryant, Andrea M. Hujer, Sai Lek, Mark D. Adams, Peter Jeavons, Alexander R. A. Anderson, Robert A. Bonomo, Jacob G. Scott |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 136 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 50 | 37% |
| United Kingdom | 11 | 8% |
| Sweden | 4 | 3% |
| Spain | 3 | 2% |
| India | 3 | 2% |
| Germany | 2 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 1% |
| Italy | 2 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 8 | 6% |
| Unknown | 49 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 70 | 51% |
| Scientists | 59 | 43% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 1% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 238 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 238 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 44 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 38 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 31 | 13% |
| Researcher | 31 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 5% |
| Other | 30 | 13% |
| Unknown | 51 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 65 | 27% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 39 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 6% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 12 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 10 | 4% |
| Other | 37 | 16% |
| Unknown | 60 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 151. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2024.
All research outputs
#277,277
of 25,715,849 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#4,085
of 58,190 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,040
of 449,342 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#107
of 1,268 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,715,849 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 58,190 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,342 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,268 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.