You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Syndecan 1 is a critical mediator of macropinocytosis in pancreatic cancer
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nature, March 2019
|
DOI | 10.1038/s41586-019-1062-1 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Wantong Yao, Johnathon L. Rose, Wei Wang, Sahil Seth, Hong Jiang, Ayumu Taguchi, Jintan Liu, Liang Yan, Avnish Kapoor, Pingping Hou, Ziheng Chen, Qiuyun Wang, Luigi Nezi, Zhaohui Xu, Jun Yao, Baoli Hu, Piergiorgio F. Pettazzoni, I Lin Ho, Ningping Feng, Vandhana Ramamoorthy, Shan Jiang, Pingna Deng, Grace J. Ma, Peter Den, Zhi Tan, Shu Xing Zhang, Huamin Wang, Y. Alan Wang, Angela K. Deem, Jason B. Fleming, Alessandro Carugo, Timothy P. Heffernan, Anirban Maitra, Andrea Viale, Haoqiang Ying, Samir Hanash, Ronald A. DePinho, Giulio F. Draetta |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 52 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 16 | 31% |
United Kingdom | 4 | 8% |
India | 2 | 4% |
Korea, Republic of | 2 | 4% |
Canada | 2 | 4% |
Finland | 1 | 2% |
Spain | 1 | 2% |
Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
France | 1 | 2% |
Other | 2 | 4% |
Unknown | 20 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 30 | 58% |
Scientists | 13 | 25% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 13% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 167 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 167 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 28 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 14 | 8% |
Student > Master | 12 | 7% |
Other | 9 | 5% |
Other | 22 | 13% |
Unknown | 56 | 34% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 49 | 29% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 13% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 9% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 8 | 5% |
Chemistry | 8 | 5% |
Other | 8 | 5% |
Unknown | 58 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 57. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2023.
All research outputs
#747,523
of 25,559,053 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#27,859
of 98,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,213
of 365,385 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#609
of 1,042 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,559,053 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,240 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,385 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,042 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.