↓ Skip to main content

Guidelines for using sigQC for systematic evaluation of gene signatures

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Protocols, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
42 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Guidelines for using sigQC for systematic evaluation of gene signatures
Published in
Nature Protocols, April 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41596-019-0136-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrew Dhawan, Alessandro Barberis, Wei-Chen Cheng, Enric Domingo, Catharine West, Tim Maughan, Jacob G. Scott, Adrian L. Harris, Francesca M. Buffa

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 42 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 64 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 17%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Student > Master 6 9%
Student > Postgraduate 4 6%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 17 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 11%
Computer Science 2 3%
Physics and Astronomy 2 3%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 21 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2019.
All research outputs
#1,439,692
of 24,938,276 outputs
Outputs from Nature Protocols
#465
of 2,895 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,692
of 359,332 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Protocols
#11
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,938,276 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,895 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,332 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.