| Title |
Global Carbon Budget 2020
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Earth System Science Data, December 2020
|
| DOI | 10.5194/essd-12-3269-2020 |
| Authors |
Pierre Friedlingstein, Michael O'Sullivan, Matthew W. Jones, Robbie M. Andrew, Judith Hauck, Are Olsen, Glen P. Peters, Wouter Peters, Julia Pongratz, Stephen Sitch, Corinne Le Quéré, Josep G. Canadell, Philippe Ciais, Robert B. Jackson, Simone Alin, Luiz E. O. C. Aragão, Almut Arneth, Vivek Arora, Nicholas R. Bates, Meike Becker, Alice Benoit-Cattin, Henry C. Bittig, Laurent Bopp, Selma Bultan, Naveen Chandra, Frédéric Chevallier, Louise P. Chini, Wiley Evans, Liesbeth Florentie, Piers M. Forster, Thomas Gasser, Marion Gehlen, Dennis Gilfillan, Thanos Gkritzalis, Luke Gregor, Nicolas Gruber, Ian Harris, Kerstin Hartung, Vanessa Haverd, Richard A. Houghton, Tatiana Ilyina, Atul K. Jain, Emilie Joetzjer, Koji Kadono, Etsushi Kato, Vassilis Kitidis, Jan Ivar Korsbakken, Peter Landschützer, Nathalie Lefèvre, Andrew Lenton, Sebastian Lienert, Zhu Liu, Danica Lombardozzi, Gregg Marland, Nicolas Metzl, David R. Munro, Julia E. M. S. Nabel, Shin-Ichiro Nakaoka, Yosuke Niwa, Kevin O'Brien, Tsuneo Ono, Paul I. Palmer, Denis Pierrot, Benjamin Poulter, Laure Resplandy, Eddy Robertson, Christian Rödenbeck, Jörg Schwinger, Roland Séférian, Ingunn Skjelvan, Adam J. P. Smith, Adrienne J. Sutton, Toste Tanhua, Pieter P. Tans, Hanqin Tian, Bronte Tilbrook, Guido van der Werf, Nicolas Vuichard, Anthony P. Walker, Rik Wanninkhof, Andrew J. Watson, David Willis, Andrew J. Wiltshire, Wenping Yuan, Xu Yue, Sönke Zaehle |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 593 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 91 | 15% |
| United Kingdom | 40 | 7% |
| Germany | 24 | 4% |
| France | 22 | 4% |
| Canada | 14 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 12 | 2% |
| Spain | 9 | 2% |
| Sweden | 9 | 2% |
| Australia | 8 | 1% |
| Other | 91 | 15% |
| Unknown | 273 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 465 | 78% |
| Scientists | 101 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 20 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2,371 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2371 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 394 | 17% |
| Researcher | 317 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 281 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 202 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 71 | 3% |
| Other | 275 | 12% |
| Unknown | 831 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 373 | 16% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 276 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 163 | 7% |
| Engineering | 127 | 5% |
| Chemistry | 67 | 3% |
| Other | 411 | 17% |
| Unknown | 954 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2752. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2024.
All research outputs
#2,636
of 25,766,791 outputs
Outputs from Earth System Science Data
#3
of 1,475 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#150
of 529,863 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Earth System Science Data
#1
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,766,791 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,475 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 529,863 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.