You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms in COVID-19 survivors: online population survey
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BJPsych Open, February 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1192/bjo.2021.3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Samuel R. Chamberlain, Jon E. Grant, William Trender, Peter Hellyer, Adam Hampshire |
| Abstract |
This study examined post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms in 13 049 survivors of suspected or confirmed COVID-19, from the UK general population, as a function of severity and hospital admission status. Compared with mild COVID-19, significantly elevated rates of PTSD symptoms were identified in those requiring medical support at home (effect size 0.178 s.d., P = 0.0316), those requiring hospital admission without ventilation (effect size 0.234 s.d., P = 0.0064) and those requiring hospital admission with ventilator support (effect size 0.454 s.d., P < 0.001). Intrusive images were the most prominent elevated symptom. Adequate psychiatric provision for such individuals will be of paramount importance. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 56 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 15 | 27% |
| United States | 10 | 18% |
| Spain | 4 | 7% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Finland | 1 | 2% |
| Ireland | 1 | 2% |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 22 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 37 | 66% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 18% |
| Scientists | 7 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 173 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 173 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 14% |
| Researcher | 15 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 30 | 17% |
| Unknown | 72 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 31 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 8% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 17 | 10% |
| Unknown | 79 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 215. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2022.
All research outputs
#183,142
of 25,707,225 outputs
Outputs from BJPsych Open
#17
of 1,113 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,773
of 545,572 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BJPsych Open
#1
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,707,225 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,113 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 545,572 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.