↓ Skip to main content

Porous, Crystalline, Covalent Organic Frameworks

Overview of attention for article published in Science, November 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
twitter
4 X users
patent
82 patents
wikipedia
10 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
5713 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2358 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
connotea
2 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Porous, Crystalline, Covalent Organic Frameworks
Published in
Science, November 2005
DOI 10.1126/science.1120411
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adrien P. Côté, Annabelle I. Benin, Nathan W. Ockwig, Michael O'Keeffe, Adam J. Matzger, Omar M. Yaghi

Abstract

Covalent organic frameworks (COFs) have been designed and successfully synthesized by condensation reactions of phenyl diboronic acid {C6H4[B(OH)2]2} and hexahydroxytriphenylene [C18H6(OH)6]. Powder x-ray diffraction studies of the highly crystalline products (C3H2BO)6.(C9H12)1 (COF-1) and C9H4BO2 (COF-5) revealed expanded porous graphitic layers that are either staggered (COF-1, P6(3)/mmc) or eclipsed (COF-5, P6/mmm). Their crystal structures are entirely held by strong bonds between B, C, and O atoms to form rigid porous architectures with pore sizes ranging from 7 to 27 angstroms. COF-1 and COF-5 exhibit high thermal stability (to temperatures up to 500 degrees to 600 degrees C), permanent porosity, and high surface areas (711 and 1590 square meters per gram, respectively).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2,358 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 16 <1%
Germany 8 <1%
United Kingdom 6 <1%
Spain 3 <1%
Japan 3 <1%
France 2 <1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Other 7 <1%
Unknown 2309 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 584 25%
Student > Master 317 13%
Researcher 269 11%
Student > Bachelor 194 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 131 6%
Other 274 12%
Unknown 589 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 1130 48%
Materials Science 168 7%
Chemical Engineering 126 5%
Engineering 82 3%
Physics and Astronomy 67 3%
Other 100 4%
Unknown 685 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 74. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2024.
All research outputs
#500,032
of 23,206,358 outputs
Outputs from Science
#11,770
of 78,289 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#976
of 147,457 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#14
of 269 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,206,358 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 78,289 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 62.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 147,457 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 269 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.