↓ Skip to main content

Exploring the Mechanical Anisotropy and Ideal Strengths of Tetragonal B4CO4

Overview of attention for article published in Materials, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Exploring the Mechanical Anisotropy and Ideal Strengths of Tetragonal B4CO4
Published in
Materials, February 2017
DOI 10.3390/ma10020128
Pubmed ID
Authors

Baobing Zheng, Meiguang Zhang, Canjun Wang

Abstract

First-principles calculations were employed to study the mechanical properties for the recently proposed tetragonal B₄CO₄ (t-B₄CO₄). The calculated structural parameters and elastic constants of t-B₄CO₄ are in excellent agreement with the previous results, indicating the reliability of the present calculations. The directional dependences of the Young's modulus and shear modulus for t-B₄CO₄ are deduced in detail, and the corresponding results suggest that the t-B₄CO₄ possesses a high degree of anisotropy. Based on the strain-stress method, the ideal tensile and shear strengths along the principal crystal directions are calculated, and the obtained results indicate that the shear mode along (001)[100] slip system dominates the plastic deformation of t-B₄CO₄, which can be ascribed to the breaking of the ionic B-O bonds. The weakest ideal shear strength of 27.5 GPa demonstrates that the t-B₄CO₄ compound is not a superhard material, but is indeed a hard material. Based on the atomic explanation that the ternary B-C-O compounds cannot acquire high ideal strength, we propose two possible routes to design superhard B-C-O compounds.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 33%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 33%
Student > Master 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 1 33%
Chemistry 1 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2017.
All research outputs
#15,440,760
of 22,950,943 outputs
Outputs from Materials
#2,730
of 7,664 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#257,113
of 420,768 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Materials
#131
of 245 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,950,943 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,664 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,768 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 245 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.