↓ Skip to main content

Large-scale analysis of the human and mouse transcriptomes

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, March 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
patent
30 patents
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
1301 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
616 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
connotea
10 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Large-scale analysis of the human and mouse transcriptomes
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, March 2002
DOI 10.1073/pnas.012025199
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrew I. Su, Michael P. Cooke, Keith A. Ching, Yaron Hakak, John R. Walker, Tim Wiltshire, Anthony P. Orth, Raquel G. Vega, Lisa M. Sapinoso, Aziz Moqrich, Ardem Patapoutian, Garret M. Hampton, Peter G. Schultz, John B. Hogenesch

Abstract

High-throughput gene expression profiling has become an important tool for investigating transcriptional activity in a variety of biological samples. To date, the vast majority of these experiments have focused on specific biological processes and perturbations. Here, we have generated and analyzed gene expression from a set of samples spanning a broad range of biological conditions. Specifically, we profiled gene expression from 91 human and mouse samples across a diverse array of tissues, organs, and cell lines. Because these samples predominantly come from the normal physiological state in the human and mouse, this dataset represents a preliminary, but substantial, description of the normal mammalian transcriptome. We have used this dataset to illustrate methods of mining these data, and to reveal insights into molecular and physiological gene function, mechanisms of transcriptional regulation, disease etiology, and comparative genomics. Finally, to allow the scientific community to use this resource, we have built a free and publicly accessible website (http://expression.gnf.org) that integrates data visualization and curation of current gene annotations.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 616 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 15 2%
United Kingdom 14 2%
Germany 6 <1%
Spain 4 <1%
Netherlands 3 <1%
Denmark 2 <1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Other 12 2%
Unknown 555 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 168 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 143 23%
Professor > Associate Professor 54 9%
Student > Master 51 8%
Professor 41 7%
Other 109 18%
Unknown 50 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 296 48%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 90 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 51 8%
Computer Science 34 6%
Engineering 19 3%
Other 57 9%
Unknown 69 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2023.
All research outputs
#1,811,754
of 24,625,114 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#23,062
of 101,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,984
of 125,002 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#38
of 592 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,625,114 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 101,438 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 125,002 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 592 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.