You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Systematic Design of Pore Size and Functionality in Isoreticular MOFs and Their Application in Methane Storage
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science, January 2002
|
| DOI | 10.1126/science.1067208 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mohamed Eddaoudi, Jaheon Kim, Nathaniel Rosi, David Vodak, Joseph Wachter, Michael O'Keeffe, Omar M. Yaghi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2,596 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 22 | <1% |
| Germany | 13 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 10 | <1% |
| Spain | 6 | <1% |
| Canada | 4 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 3 | <1% |
| Poland | 3 | <1% |
| Japan | 3 | <1% |
| Belgium | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 19 | <1% |
| Unknown | 2510 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 658 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 406 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 266 | 10% |
| Researcher | 262 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 133 | 5% |
| Other | 296 | 11% |
| Unknown | 575 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 1297 | 50% |
| Materials Science | 158 | 6% |
| Chemical Engineering | 144 | 6% |
| Engineering | 144 | 6% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 55 | 2% |
| Other | 134 | 5% |
| Unknown | 664 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,184,664
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Science
#20,923
of 83,593 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,634
of 135,916 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#24
of 280 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83,593 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 65.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 135,916 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 280 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.