You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Exceptional chemical and thermal stability of zeolitic imidazolate frameworks
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, July 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1073/pnas.0602439103 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kyo Sung Park, Zheng Ni, Adrien P. Côté, Jae Yong Choi, Rudan Huang, Fernando J. Uribe-Romo, Hee K. Chae, Michael O’Keeffe, Omar M. Yaghi |
| Abstract |
Twelve zeolitic imidazolate frameworks (ZIFs; termed ZIF-1 to -12) have been synthesized as crystals by copolymerization of either Zn(II) (ZIF-1 to -4, -6 to -8, and -10 to -11) or Co(II) (ZIF-9 and -12) with imidazolate-type links. The ZIF crystal structures are based on the nets of seven distinct aluminosilicate zeolites: tetrahedral Si(Al) and the bridging O are replaced with transition metal ion and imidazolate link, respectively. In addition, one example of mixed-coordination imidazolate of Zn(II) and In(III) (ZIF-5) based on the garnet net is reported. Study of the gas adsorption and thermal and chemical stability of two prototypical members, ZIF-8 and -11, demonstrated their permanent porosity (Langmuir surface area = 1,810 m(2)/g), high thermal stability (up to 550 degrees C), and remarkable chemical resistance to boiling alkaline water and organic solvents. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 50% |
| Equatorial Guinea | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2,973 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 12 | <1% |
| Germany | 9 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | <1% |
| Canada | 6 | <1% |
| Japan | 5 | <1% |
| Turkey | 3 | <1% |
| Spain | 3 | <1% |
| Belgium | 3 | <1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 16 | <1% |
| Unknown | 2907 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 647 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 441 | 15% |
| Researcher | 310 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 242 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 153 | 5% |
| Other | 373 | 13% |
| Unknown | 807 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 1042 | 35% |
| Chemical Engineering | 294 | 10% |
| Engineering | 243 | 8% |
| Materials Science | 215 | 7% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 52 | 2% |
| Other | 204 | 7% |
| Unknown | 923 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2023.
All research outputs
#1,195,263
of 24,827,122 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#17,491
of 101,851 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,923
of 78,104 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#37
of 580 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,827,122 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 101,851 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 78,104 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 580 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.