You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Early Transmission Dynamics in Wuhan, China, of Novel Coronavirus–Infected Pneumonia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
New England Journal of Medicine, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1056/nejmoa2001316 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Qun Li, Xuhua Guan, Peng Wu, Xiaoye Wang, Lei Zhou, Yeqing Tong, Ruiqi Ren, Kathy S M Leung, Eric H Y Lau, Jessica Y Wong, Xuesen Xing, Nijuan Xiang, Yang Wu, Chao Li, Qi Chen, Dan Li, Tian Liu, Jing Zhao, Man Liu, Wenxiao Tu, Chuding Chen, Lianmei Jin, Rui Yang, Qi Wang, Suhua Zhou, Rui Wang, Hui Liu, Yinbo Luo, Yuan Liu, Ge Shao, Huan Li, Zhongfa Tao, Yang Yang, Zhiqiang Deng, Boxi Liu, Zhitao Ma, Yanping Zhang, Guoqing Shi, Tommy T Y Lam, Joseph T Wu, George F Gao, Benjamin J Cowling, Bo Yang, Gabriel M Leung, Zijian Feng |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4,973 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 617 | 12% |
| Japan | 248 | 5% |
| Spain | 219 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 126 | 3% |
| Canada | 102 | 2% |
| Thailand | 78 | 2% |
| Australia | 64 | 1% |
| Argentina | 61 | 1% |
| France | 56 | 1% |
| Other | 790 | 16% |
| Unknown | 2612 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4284 | 86% |
| Scientists | 365 | 7% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 238 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 82 | 2% |
| Unknown | 4 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16,200 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 16200 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 2108 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 1762 | 11% |
| Researcher | 1460 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1123 | 7% |
| Other | 878 | 5% |
| Other | 3006 | 19% |
| Unknown | 5863 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3492 | 22% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 994 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 869 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 563 | 3% |
| Engineering | 483 | 3% |
| Other | 3265 | 20% |
| Unknown | 6534 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6548. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2024.
All research outputs
#473
of 25,753,031 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#49
of 32,668 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20
of 477,909 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#7
of 253 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,753,031 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,668 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 123.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 477,909 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 253 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.