| Title |
Clinical Characteristics of Coronavirus Disease 2019 in China
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
New England Journal of Medicine, February 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1056/nejmoa2002032 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Wei-Jie Guan, Zheng-Yi Ni, Yu Hu, Wen-Hua Liang, Chun-Quan Ou, Jian-Xing He, Lei Liu, Hong Shan, Chun-Liang Lei, David S C Hui, Bin Du, Lan-Juan Li, Guang Zeng, Kwok-Yung Yuen, Ru-Chong Chen, Chun-Li Tang, Tao Wang, Ping-Yan Chen, Jie Xiang, Shi-Yue Li, Jin-Lin Wang, Zi-Jing Liang, Yi-Xiang Peng, Li Wei, Yong Liu, Ya-Hua Hu, Peng Peng, Jian-Ming Wang, Ji-Yang Liu, Zhong Chen, Gang Li, Zhi-Jian Zheng, Shao-Qin Qiu, Jie Luo, Chang-Jiang Ye, Shao-Yong Zhu, Nan-Shan Zhong |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19,743 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Thailand | 1980 | 10% |
| United States | 1141 | 6% |
| Japan | 780 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 507 | 3% |
| Spain | 170 | <1% |
| France | 135 | <1% |
| Canada | 117 | <1% |
| Australia | 110 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 109 | <1% |
| Other | 1284 | 7% |
| Unknown | 13410 | 68% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18524 | 94% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 588 | 3% |
| Scientists | 509 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 117 | <1% |
| Unknown | 5 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22,811 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 22811 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 2788 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 2152 | 9% |
| Researcher | 2146 | 9% |
| Other | 1520 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1418 | 6% |
| Other | 4490 | 20% |
| Unknown | 8297 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6625 | 29% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1275 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1007 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 613 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 582 | 3% |
| Other | 3456 | 15% |
| Unknown | 9253 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9700. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2024.
All research outputs
#201
of 25,753,031 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#20
of 32,668 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19
of 384,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#4
of 316 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,753,031 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,668 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 123.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 384,173 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 316 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.