You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparing groups versus individuals in decision making: a systematic review protocol
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Evidence, September 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13750-016-0066-7 |
| Authors |
Nibedita Mukherjee, Lynn V. Dicks, Gorm E. Shackelford, Bhaskar Vira, William J. Sutherland |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Belgium | 1 | 20% |
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
| Australia | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 106 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 11% |
| Researcher | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 11% |
| Unknown | 31 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 14% |
| Psychology | 13 | 12% |
| Environmental Science | 9 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 8 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 26 | 24% |
| Unknown | 32 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2016.
All research outputs
#12,944,011
of 23,340,595 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Evidence
#238
of 303 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#167,532
of 337,280 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Evidence
#7
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,340,595 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 303 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,280 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.