↓ Skip to main content

An interdisciplinary framework to evaluate bioshield plantations: Insights from peninsular India

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Oecologica, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
94 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An interdisciplinary framework to evaluate bioshield plantations: Insights from peninsular India
Published in
Acta Oecologica, February 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.actao.2014.01.005
Authors

Nibedita Mukherjee, Farid Dahdouh-Guebas, Nico Koedam, Kartik Shanker

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Kenya 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 90 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 27 29%
Student > Master 17 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 12%
Other 9 10%
Student > Bachelor 5 5%
Other 15 16%
Unknown 10 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 36 38%
Environmental Science 31 33%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 3%
Engineering 2 2%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 12 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2014.
All research outputs
#4,836,328
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Acta Oecologica
#74
of 573 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,638
of 361,176 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Oecologica
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 573 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,176 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.