↓ Skip to main content

Using expert knowledge and modeling to define mangrove composition, functioning, and threats and estimate time frame for recovery

Overview of attention for article published in Ecology and Evolution, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
272 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Using expert knowledge and modeling to define mangrove composition, functioning, and threats and estimate time frame for recovery
Published in
Ecology and Evolution, May 2014
DOI 10.1002/ece3.1085
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nibedita Mukherjee, William J Sutherland, Nabiul I Khan, Uta Berger, Nele Schmitz, Farid Dahdouh-Guebas, Nico Koedam

Abstract

Mangroves are threatened worldwide, and their loss or degradation could impact functioning of the ecosystem. Our aim was to investigate three aspects of mangroves at a global scale: (1) their constituents (2) their indispensable ecological functions, and (3) the maintenance of their constituents and functions in degraded mangroves. We focused on answering two questions: "What is a mangrove ecosystem" and "How vulnerable are mangrove ecosystems to different impacts"? We invited 106 mangrove experts globally to participate in a survey based on the Delphi technique and provide inputs on the three aspects. The outputs from the Delphi technique for the third aspect, i.e. maintenance of constituents and functions were incorporated in a modeling approach to simulate the time frame for recovery. Presented here for the first time are the consensus definition of the mangrove ecosystem and the list of mangrove plant species. In this study, experts considered even monospecific (tree) stands to be a mangrove ecosystem as long as there was adequate tidal exchange, propagule dispersal, and faunal interactions. We provide a ranking of the important ecological functions, faunal groups, and impacts on mangroves. Degradation due to development was identified as having the largest impact on mangroves globally in terms of spatial scale, intensity, and time needed for restoration. The results indicate that mangroves are ecologically unique even though they may be species poor (from the vegetation perspective). The consensus list of mangrove species and the ranking of the mangrove ecological functions could be a useful tool for restoration and management of mangroves. While there is ample literature on the destruction of mangroves due to aquaculture in the past decade, this study clearly shows that more attention must go to avoiding and mitigating mangrove loss due to coastal development (such as building of roads, ports, or harbors).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 272 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 264 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 54 20%
Researcher 48 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 14%
Student > Bachelor 28 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 4%
Other 41 15%
Unknown 54 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 84 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 79 29%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 13 5%
Engineering 6 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 1%
Other 26 10%
Unknown 60 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2014.
All research outputs
#6,753,656
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Ecology and Evolution
#3,512
of 8,476 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,877
of 242,098 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecology and Evolution
#31
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,476 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,098 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.