You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A methodological guide to using and reporting on interviews in conservation science research
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Methods in Ecology and Evolution, January 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1111/2041-210x.12828 |
| Authors |
Juliette C. Young, David C. Rose, Hannah S. Mumby, Francisco Benitez‐Capistros, Christina J. Derrick, Tom Finch, Carolina Garcia, Chandrima Home, Esha Marwaha, Courtney Morgans, Stephen Parkinson, Jay Shah, Kerrie A. Wilson, Nibedita Mukherjee |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 121 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 35 | 29% |
| United States | 9 | 7% |
| India | 7 | 6% |
| Australia | 6 | 5% |
| France | 3 | 2% |
| Romania | 2 | 2% |
| Chile | 2 | 2% |
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| Portugal | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 8% |
| Unknown | 43 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 76 | 63% |
| Scientists | 40 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,252 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1252 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 223 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 181 | 14% |
| Researcher | 133 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 117 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 68 | 5% |
| Other | 162 | 13% |
| Unknown | 368 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 217 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 198 | 16% |
| Social Sciences | 94 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 57 | 5% |
| Engineering | 36 | 3% |
| Other | 225 | 18% |
| Unknown | 425 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 82. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2020.
All research outputs
#528,597
of 25,782,229 outputs
Outputs from Methods in Ecology and Evolution
#119
of 2,464 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,131
of 453,571 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in Ecology and Evolution
#6
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,782,229 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,464 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 453,571 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.