You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparison of techniques for eliciting views and judgements in decision‐making
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Methods in Ecology and Evolution, January 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1111/2041-210x.12940 |
| Authors |
Nibedita Mukherjee, Aiora Zabala, Jean Huge, Tobias Ochieng Nyumba, Blal Adem Esmail, William J. Sutherland |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 12 | 31% |
| Portugal | 3 | 8% |
| Argentina | 3 | 8% |
| United States | 2 | 5% |
| Canada | 2 | 5% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Sweden | 1 | 3% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 3% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 10 | 26% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 51% |
| Scientists | 15 | 38% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 8% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 403 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 403 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 85 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 65 | 16% |
| Researcher | 62 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 23 | 6% |
| Other | 21 | 5% |
| Other | 66 | 16% |
| Unknown | 81 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 90 | 22% |
| Environmental Science | 89 | 22% |
| Social Sciences | 21 | 5% |
| Engineering | 15 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 12 | 3% |
| Other | 67 | 17% |
| Unknown | 109 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 63. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2019.
All research outputs
#692,938
of 25,791,495 outputs
Outputs from Methods in Ecology and Evolution
#190
of 2,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,844
of 453,643 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in Ecology and Evolution
#9
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,791,495 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 453,643 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.