You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The nominal group technique in ecology & conservation: Application and challenges
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Methods in Ecology and Evolution, January 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1111/2041-210x.12831 |
| Authors |
Jean Hugé, Nibedita Mukherjee |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 50% |
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| Canada | 1 | 8% |
| Norway | 1 | 8% |
| Uruguay | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 2 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 58% |
| Scientists | 4 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 241 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 241 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 38 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 36 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 26 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 17 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 5% |
| Other | 50 | 21% |
| Unknown | 61 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 54 | 22% |
| Environmental Science | 38 | 16% |
| Social Sciences | 19 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 37 | 15% |
| Unknown | 75 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2018.
All research outputs
#1,884,014
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Methods in Ecology and Evolution
#871
of 2,442 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,725
of 450,898 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in Ecology and Evolution
#24
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,442 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,898 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.