You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Shelter from the storm? Use and misuse of coastal vegetation bioshields for managing natural disasters
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Conservation Letters, February 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1755-263x.2009.00087.x |
| Authors |
Rusty A. Feagin, Nibedita Mukherjee, Kartik Shanker, Andrew H. Baird, Joshua Cinner, Alexander M. Kerr, Nico Koedam, Aarthi Sridhar, Rohan Arthur, L.P. Jayatissa, Danny Lo Seen, Manju Menon, Sudarshan Rodriguez, Shamsuddoha, Farid Dahdouh‐Guebas |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 384 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 1% |
| Australia | 3 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Sweden | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| India | 2 | <1% |
| Kenya | 1 | <1% |
| Vietnam | 1 | <1% |
| Ecuador | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 8 | 2% |
| Unknown | 357 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 103 | 27% |
| Student > Master | 59 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 56 | 15% |
| Other | 24 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 6% |
| Other | 68 | 18% |
| Unknown | 51 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 142 | 37% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 83 | 22% |
| Engineering | 28 | 7% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 24 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 16 | 4% |
| Other | 26 | 7% |
| Unknown | 65 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2017.
All research outputs
#1,404,753
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Letters
#448
of 1,065 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,155
of 174,351 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Letters
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,065 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 52.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,351 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them