@JamesSheph41105 show some science on how much masks work.. Masks dont work https://t.co/4kwatuYZ6D https://t.co/0RmrSaG8OI https://t.co/u1MR1VUTtR https://t.co/WQgA4SYFdj https://t.co/zeOAD2x4La https://t.co/1gz4qlnlS2 https://t.co/Nx8oB11QzA https://t.co
@TBD77 @EmmaLouMarsha11 @BB0941167867205 @ItsreallyRog @Smithie77 https://t.co/r90RbGiK7D "Penetration of cloth masks by particles was almost 97% and medical masks 44%." The study found that cloth mask wearers had higher rates of infection than even th
This is why masks don't work. Most people are wearing the wrong kind or they're wearing them the wrong way. This whole thing is retarded. I'm not going to live my life scared of the air.
oh no look at all those sources 😂
@PrognosticChats science is not your thing. your science is all about feelings Masks dont work https://t.co/4kwatuYZ6D https://t.co/0RmrSaG8OI https://t.co/u1MR1VUTtR https://t.co/WQgA4SYFdj https://t.co/zeOAD2x4La https://t.co/1gz4qlnlS2 https://t.co/Nx8o
@Violet_Kitteee dont bother reading science Masks dont work https://t.co/4kwatuYZ6D https://t.co/0RmrSaG8OI https://t.co/u1MR1VUTtR https://t.co/WQgA4SYFdj https://t.co/zeOAD2x4La https://t.co/1gz4qlnlS2 https://t.co/Nx8oB11QzA https://t.co/0uufLED2kg http
The desperation is thick. Like pathogen soup.
@GhostOfSocrates when has masks ever worked? Masks dont work https://t.co/4kwatuYZ6D https://t.co/0RmrSaG8OI https://t.co/u1MR1VUTtR https://t.co/WQgA4SYFdj https://t.co/zeOAD2x4La https://t.co/1gz4qlnlS2 https://t.co/Nx8oB11QzA https://t.co/0uufLED2kg htt
@hausofhemlock IF masks worked then they can use them. otherwise FUCK OFF Masks dont work https://t.co/u1MR1VUlEj https://t.co/WQgA4SY7nL https://t.co/zeOAD2wwVC https://t.co/1gz4qlmO2u https://t.co/Nx8oB11iK2 https://t.co/0uufLECuuI https://t.co/FaJt2q9Io
@DrKarenWalker so you are a retarded doctor. Masks dont work https://t.co/4kwatuYZ6D https://t.co/0RmrSaG8OI https://t.co/u1MR1VUTtR https://t.co/WQgA4SYFdj https://t.co/zeOAD2x4La https://t.co/1gz4qlnlS2 https://t.co/Nx8oB11QzA https://t.co/0uufLED2kg htt
@piersmorgan See results section, cloth face coverings have a 94% penetration rate of particles, so called medical masks have a 44% penetration rate of particles, and neither are manufactured to stop aerosolized airborne viruses. https://t.co/ZWkUvmTPUb.
RT @jamesdouma: Fate loves irony - homemade mask edition: https://t.co/noLkNQe7pR
RT @jamesdouma: Fate loves irony - homemade mask edition: https://t.co/noLkNQe7pR
RT @jamesdouma: Fate loves irony - homemade mask edition: https://t.co/noLkNQe7pR
@PIX11News WPIX is right there to modal verb Election Infection 2.0 to the credulous public Still wear the 'MASK' that US Library of Congress/NIH/.GOV Website Concluded in 2015 "Penetration of cloth masks by particles was almost 97% and medical masks 44%"?
@nvdems After you realized that all your followers suffer from credulous personality disorder(masks are 97% ineffective at stopping particles/2015/us library of congress report/.GOV website lmfao https://t.co/d42dYaw67R Guess what? The GOP 'fake voters' l
@ChuckCallesto Mostly about control and public credulity levels Perfect example: NIH Report in 2015 US Library of Congress accessible off a '.GOV" website clearly states that cloth masks are 97% ineffective at stopping particles, and medical masks 44% inef
@FOX5Vegas When BILLIONS of ppl fell for wearing a "97% ineffective at stopping particles.." According to a 2015 US Library of Congress Report from a .Gov website, it was proven that 'CREDULITY' has infected the masses(minus 'M'), ppl will believe anything
@taka32193219 @shion__gbf もう出してる 布マスクはサージカルマスクに比べ呼吸器感染症に13倍感染しやすい https://t.co/5AUx7iMRgI
@TamaTama_tanuki @taka32193219 残念ながらマスクは27万人調べても効果がわからないってデータに加えて素材布にすると感染リスク13倍に跳ね上がるデータがあるんだわ 東京データは裏付けデータにすぎない https://t.co/5AUx7iMRgI https://t.co/KUQFZXTJw3
@moreisdifferent Mask fail to provide significant protection against pathogens (covid, Virus) Mask significantly increase the chances of catching pathogens from accumulations in fabric https://t.co/EpoZ4xhMS7
@ojuken1207 @taka32193219 @BanziroG 医療用マスク使って27万人調べても有意差なし 布マスクを使うと感染リスク13倍 国民の4割はマスク使いまわし 逆効果になるのが当たり前 4年マスクしてまだ間違いに気づかないとかどうかしてる https://t.co/5AUx7iMRgI https://t.co/QJMWZHaQUK
@salthenurse08 @_nomadic_soul No, that’s FALSE. Cloth masks are potentially worse than nothing. That’s what INCREASED infection means. https://t.co/LzkpZ5qo3y
@NEWSMAX So forcing Billions to wear a "97% INEFFECTIVE at stopping particles' mask, everything now is just straight Bull$*it, The Credulous States Of America. BTW: Are the 15 million Bidinvaders included on the unemployment reports yet, or strictly just t
@AP So being BILLIONS of Sheeple wore a useless(97% ineffective at stopping particles/NIH/US Library of Congress 2015). And because of their credulity, every news report is is faker than Mike Robinisons Vajayjay- https://t.co/d42dYaw67R
@esjesjesj https://t.co/qOIkUcaF9b Fucking dumbass
RT @RandPaul: To the scolds blaming @realDonaldTrump infection on not wearing mask: the only published randomized clinical study of cloth…
@theoddmachinist @JamesSurowiecki You didn’t provide a single RCT because none exist not can you cite a place on the planet where they worked. Here’s an RCT https://t.co/Uctn8WSs85 https://t.co/LfEgrAwQv4
@TheJusticeDept Open borders and a dozen ILLEGAL ALIENS ARRESTED FOR: SEX CRIMES, BOMB MAKING are moot from this discussion authorized by PedoJoe, Ho and Co. All those mask wearers(97% ineffective at stopping particles/2015/.Gov website) believe all your B
Caution against the use of ma$ks
RT @Jude_62: @_aussie17 @naomirwolf The NIH knew in 2015 that cloth masks increased your risk of infection by airborne virus but encouraged…
RT @Jude_62: @_aussie17 @naomirwolf The NIH knew in 2015 that cloth masks increased your risk of infection by airborne virus but encouraged…
RT @Jude_62: @_aussie17 @naomirwolf The NIH knew in 2015 that cloth masks increased your risk of infection by airborne virus but encouraged…
@kevinnbass NIH .Gov Website, 2015, "Cloth masks are 97% ineffective at stopping particles, medical masks 44% ineffective.." https://t.co/d42dYaw67R
@hutchleah She is still smarter then anyone that would wear a mask.. "Rates of infection were consistently higher among those in the cloth mask group" https://t.co/EpoZ4xhMS7
RT @Jude_62: @_aussie17 @naomirwolf The NIH knew in 2015 that cloth masks increased your risk of infection by airborne virus but encouraged…
RT @Jude_62: @_aussie17 @naomirwolf The NIH knew in 2015 that cloth masks increased your risk of infection by airborne virus but encouraged…
@_aussie17 @naomirwolf The NIH knew in 2015 that cloth masks increased your risk of infection by airborne virus but encouraged them anyway. They also knew vitamin D would help dark complected people stay healthier against COVID. Said nothing. https://t.co/
@libsoftiktok See results section, cloth face coverings have a 94% penetration rate of particles, so called medical masks have a 44% penetration rate of particles, and neither are manufactured to stop aerosolized airborne viruses. https://t.co/ZWkUvmTPUb
@rossin2 @JFS0six @DavidSacks More on masks in the surgical theatre (and Scientism theater): https://t.co/MiAprxzpua
@ViralNewsNYC It was only about control- 2015 US Library of Congress, National Institute of Health(NIH) study results, "Penetration of cloth masks by particles was almost 97% and medical masks 44%." https://t.co/d42dYaw67R
@BobbySimes1 A cluster randomised trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers https://t.co/nmaUNxLdzp
@ShelbyGrahm @Unclejuzzy @CheshireHerald A cluster randomised trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers https://t.co/nmaUNxLdzp
@Jason_Abate @NjbBari3 A cluster randomised trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers https://t.co/nmaUNxLdzp
@ResterContent @Fiona_M_Russell A cluster randomised trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers https://t.co/nmaUNxLdzp
@DanishScience @BostonBloodSox @LaGrecca333 A cluster randomised trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers https://t.co/nmaUNxLdzp
@DrakeSadron @rosanthony3 @joshtpm that was not a lie. look, an N95 is needed for people like my wife, a surgical mask is fine for normal people. A cloth mask is useless if you are stationary breathing in all day as particulate matter will seep through. h
@MDPHD_mouchoi @FORCEPS4 ちなみにマスク内を空気が通るようにすると感染リスクが跳ね上がる危険性があることがコロナ以前の論文によりわかっている 布マスクつけると感染リスクが13倍になる https://t.co/5AUx7iMRgI
@DailyCaller Amazing that 'Media' portrays themselves as know all G-ds, and wants us believe they are 100% ignorant to researching Lewy Body Dementia. In medias defense they hoarded to SHEEPLE A+ with wearing a 97% ineffective at stopping particle mask- .G
@masataka2600 @Z4dONWqFHnnJ8rY @tabisukky @hirasawa_makiko 濾過率ゼロと考えたらコクランレビューおよび13倍布マスク問題全部解決できるんだよ 布マスクをつけると感染リスクが13倍に跳ね上がる https://t.co/5AUx7iMRgI
@masataka2600 @Z4dONWqFHnnJ8rY @tabisukky @hirasawa_makiko 呼気は全部不織布の隙間から抜けている ちなみに布マスクのようにマスクを通る素材を使うとなぜか感染率が跳ね上がる論文がある お前マスク想定全部間違えてるで https://t.co/5AUx7iMRgI
@ayano110 @tabisukky @hirasawa_makiko ②素材が布だと感染リスク13倍 https://t.co/5AUx7iMRgI
@shepherd_123 @tabisukky @hirasawa_makiko マスクの素材を布にすると感染リスク13倍 https://t.co/5AUx7iMRgI
@AnnadeBuisseret See results section, cloth face coverings have a 94% penetration rate of particles, so called medical masks have a 44% penetration rate of particles, and neither are manufactured to stop aerosolized airborne viruses. https://t.co/ZWkUvmU
@mingtanzhend @Snitch_h @moemoejapan 素材を布にすると感染リスク13倍 お前らの使い方では逆効果 https://t.co/5AUx7iMRgI
@DWsT7p3XeXyxEyr ①コクランレビューによると27万人調べてもマスクの効果は不明(これを超える証明力論文世界に存在せず) ②素材を布にすると感染リスクが13倍に跳ね上がる https://t.co/5AUx7iMRgI ③国民の4割は不織布マスク使いまわし 結論 お前らの使い方ではマスクは逆効果 https://t.co/bodx19DNnv
The study: "Main outcome measure Clinical respiratory illness (CRI), influenza-like illness (ILI) and laboratory-confirmed respiratory virus infection. Results The rates of all infection outcomes were highest in the cloth mask arm, with the rate of ILI st
The study: "Main outcome measure Clinical respiratory illness (CRI), influenza-like illness (ILI) and laboratory-confirmed respiratory virus infection. Results The rates of all infection outcomes were highest in the cloth mask arm, with the rate of ILI st
@fireballfilms @DarleneDempsey6 @rasatab @boldlycarryon @frostykaden @robynsun_love @kaisap112 @alitlstrawberry The original MacIntyre 2015 study: https://t.co/ur3mRJmumc
@alitlstrawberry And more science regarding efficacy and safety https://t.co/HPKwNyRePx https://t.co/7Hb7IojUlD https://t.co/nD5QjQKlS0 https://t.co/1NIXxMaPFY https://t.co/G7WPeuy3Mb https://t.co/bJvueITMmf
@AAC0519 @jewmeini @nytimes According to random control trial result, cloth masks are associated with increased infections. This is how we know that, very likely, mask mandates were not about reducing spread. https://t.co/iIdbCyk2z6
RT @DrDMartinWorld: Several recent "studies" have "discovered" that cloth masks not only didn't work but increased influenza-like illness.…
@elonmusk Just one question (unrelated)... why is he wearing the face diaper? Is the evidance not clear by now? • https://t.co/lUL5g1IvQc • https://t.co/WYhR3nkYR8 • https://t.co/hOGEojpbb5 • https://t.co/NMKa1coxCH • https://t.co/BB2p4CuAT1 •https:
@Xyz8590 @rjp_news 素材を布にするだけで感染リスクは13倍に跳ね上がるなど不適切不衛生マスクにより実際には逆効果 さらに国民の4割は不織布マスク使いまわし 結論 マスクは逆効果 https://t.co/5AUx7iMRgI https://t.co/sytcWAqYjl