↓ Skip to main content

BMJ

Lack of an association or an inverse association between low-density-lipoprotein cholesterol and mortality in the elderly: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in BMJ Open, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#7 of 25,927)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
243 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
559 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
Lack of an association or an inverse association between low-density-lipoprotein cholesterol and mortality in the elderly: a systematic review
Published in
BMJ Open, June 2016
DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010401
Pubmed ID
Authors

Uffe Ravnskov, David M Diamond, Rokura Hama, Tomohito Hamazaki, Björn Hammarskjöld, Niamh Hynes, Malcolm Kendrick, Peter H Langsjoen, Aseem Malhotra, Luca Mascitelli, Kilmer S McCully, Yoichi Ogushi, Harumi Okuyama, Paul J Rosch, Tore Schersten, Sherif Sultan, Ralf Sundberg

Abstract

It is well known that total cholesterol becomes less of a risk factor or not at all for all-cause and cardiovascular (CV) mortality with increasing age, but as little is known as to whether low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), one component of total cholesterol, is associated with mortality in the elderly, we decided to investigate this issue. We sought PubMed for cohort studies, where LDL-C had been investigated as a risk factor for all-cause and/or CV mortality in individuals ≥60 years from the general population. We identified 19 cohort studies including 30 cohorts with a total of 68 094 elderly people, where all-cause mortality was recorded in 28 cohorts and CV mortality in 9 cohorts. Inverse association between all-cause mortality and LDL-C was seen in 16 cohorts (in 14 with statistical significance) representing 92% of the number of participants, where this association was recorded. In the rest, no association was found. In two cohorts, CV mortality was highest in the lowest LDL-C quartile and with statistical significance; in seven cohorts, no association was found. High LDL-C is inversely associated with mortality in most people over 60 years. This finding is inconsistent with the cholesterol hypothesis (ie, that cholesterol, particularly LDL-C, is inherently atherogenic). Since elderly people with high LDL-C live as long or longer than those with low LDL-C, our analysis provides reason to question the validity of the cholesterol hypothesis. Moreover, our study provides the rationale for a re-evaluation of guidelines recommending pharmacological reduction of LDL-C in the elderly as a component of cardiovascular disease prevention strategies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,754 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 559 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 550 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 88 16%
Other 75 13%
Student > Master 70 13%
Researcher 65 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 6%
Other 118 21%
Unknown 107 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 192 34%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 52 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 43 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 5%
Sports and Recreations 15 3%
Other 98 18%
Unknown 131 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2324. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2024.
All research outputs
#3,570
of 25,779,988 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open
#7
of 25,927 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24
of 369,070 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open
#1
of 380 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,779,988 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,927 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,070 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 380 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.