↓ Skip to main content

Direct and indirect negative ties and individual performance

Overview of attention for article published in Social Networks, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
127 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Direct and indirect negative ties and individual performance
Published in
Social Networks, January 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.socnet.2015.09.003
Authors

Joshua E. Marineau, Giuseppe Labianca, Gerald C. Kane

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 2 2%
Hungary 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Unknown 123 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 29%
Student > Master 16 13%
Researcher 9 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 7%
Professor 8 6%
Other 26 20%
Unknown 22 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 35 28%
Business, Management and Accounting 33 26%
Psychology 11 9%
Engineering 4 3%
Computer Science 3 2%
Other 12 9%
Unknown 29 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2015.
All research outputs
#17,235,658
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Social Networks
#700
of 957 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#241,507
of 399,679 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Social Networks
#19
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 957 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,679 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.