You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Using Mixed-Method Design and Network Analysis to Measure Development of Interagency Collaboration
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
American Journal of Evaluation, June 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1177/1098214009340044 |
| Authors |
Jennifer Eileen Cross, Ellyn Dickmann, Rebecca Newman-Gonchar, Jesse Michael Fagan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 190 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Puerto Rico | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 176 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 43 | 23% |
| Researcher | 32 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 29 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 22 | 12% |
| Other | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 32 | 17% |
| Unknown | 21 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 81 | 43% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 20 | 11% |
| Psychology | 12 | 6% |
| Environmental Science | 11 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 34 | 18% |
| Unknown | 23 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2012.
All research outputs
#20,656,820
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Evaluation
#513
of 550 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,355
of 122,963 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Evaluation
#5
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 550 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 122,963 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.