You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Safeguarding human–wildlife cooperation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Conservation Letters, June 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1111/conl.12886 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jessica E. M. van der Wal, Claire N. Spottiswoode, Natalie T. Uomini, Mauricio Cantor, Fábio G. Daura‐Jorge, Anap I. Afan, Mairenn C. Attwood, Jenny Amphaeris, Fatima Balasani, Colleen M. Begg, Cameron J. Blair, Judith L. Bronstein, Iahaia O. Buanachique, Rion R. T. Cuthill, Jewel Das, Apurba Deb, Tanmay Dixit, Gcina S. Dlamini, Edmond Dounias, Isa I. Gedi, Martin Gruber, Lilian S. Hoffmann, Tobias Holzlehner, Hussein A. Isack, Eliupendo A. Laltaika, David J. Lloyd‐Jones, Jess Lund, Alexandre M. S. Machado, L. Mahadevan, Ignacio B. Moreno, Chima J. Nwaogu, Valdomiro L. Pereira, Raymond Pierotti, Seliano A. Rucunua, Wilson F. dos Santos, Nathalia Serpa, Brian D. Smith, Irina Tolkova, Tint Tun, João V. S. Valle‐Pereira, Brian M. Wood, Richard W. Wrangham, Dominic L. Cram |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 309 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 32 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 12 | 4% |
| United States | 11 | 4% |
| Mexico | 8 | 3% |
| Brazil | 7 | 2% |
| Colombia | 7 | 2% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 5 | 2% |
| Chile | 4 | 1% |
| South Africa | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 47 | 15% |
| Unknown | 172 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 236 | 76% |
| Scientists | 66 | 21% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 1% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 70 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 9% |
| Researcher | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 8 | 11% |
| Unknown | 23 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 20 | 29% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 20% |
| Psychology | 4 | 6% |
| Engineering | 2 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 27 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 298. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2024.
All research outputs
#119,088
of 25,782,229 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Letters
#21
of 1,073 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,766
of 450,277 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Letters
#2
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,782,229 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,073 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 53.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,277 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.