↓ Skip to main content

Standardized multi-omics of Earth’s microbiomes reveals microbial and metabolite diversity

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Microbiology, November 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
303 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
reddit
1 Redditor
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
237 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Standardized multi-omics of Earth’s microbiomes reveals microbial and metabolite diversity
Published in
Nature Microbiology, November 2022
DOI 10.1038/s41564-022-01266-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Justin P. Shaffer, Louis-Félix Nothias, Luke R. Thompson, Jon G. Sanders, Rodolfo A. Salido, Sneha P. Couvillion, Asker D. Brejnrod, Franck Lejzerowicz, Niina Haiminen, Shi Huang, Holly L. Lutz, Qiyun Zhu, Cameron Martino, James T. Morton, Smruthi Karthikeyan, Mélissa Nothias-Esposito, Kai Dührkop, Sebastian Böcker, Hyun Woo Kim, Alexander A. Aksenov, Wout Bittremieux, Jeremiah J. Minich, Clarisse Marotz, MacKenzie M. Bryant, Karenina Sanders, Tara Schwartz, Greg Humphrey, Yoshiki Vásquez-Baeza, Anupriya Tripathi, Laxmi Parida, Anna Paola Carrieri, Kristen L. Beck, Promi Das, Antonio González, Daniel McDonald, Joshua Ladau, Søren M. Karst, Mads Albertsen, Gail Ackermann, Jeff DeReus, Torsten Thomas, Daniel Petras, Ashley Shade, James Stegen, Se Jin Song, Thomas O. Metz, Austin D. Swafford, Pieter C. Dorrestein, Janet K. Jansson, Jack A. Gilbert, Rob Knight

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 303 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 237 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 237 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 46 19%
Researcher 41 17%
Student > Master 26 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 5%
Student > Postgraduate 9 4%
Other 36 15%
Unknown 67 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 51 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 33 14%
Environmental Science 25 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 9 4%
Unspecified 6 3%
Other 31 13%
Unknown 82 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 182. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2023.
All research outputs
#225,103
of 25,808,886 outputs
Outputs from Nature Microbiology
#212
of 2,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,932
of 492,236 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Microbiology
#10
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,808,886 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 95.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 492,236 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.